Destructive works in the works of potter Laurent Crast

Abstract

Abstract

          The current research dealt with (Destructive works in the works of the potter Laurent Crast) as the destructive works in the artistic works of the potter (Laurent Crast) were studied, in addition to the role of the potter in creating formal and intellectual destructive works, which carried within them destructive works. This research included four chapters concerned with it.

Chapter One: Presentation of the research problem, which is summarized in the question:

What are the destructive works in the works of the potter Laurent Crast?

As for the research objective:-

To identify the destructive works in the works of the potter Laurent Crast.

As for the research limits, they can be summarized as follows:-

1.    Objective limits:- Studying the destructive works in the works of the potter Laurent Crast.

2.    Temporal limits:- Determined temporally from the period (2006 - 2023).

3.    Spatial limits:- France.

Chapter Two: The theoretical framework, previous studies, and indicators resulting from the theoretical framework. It included two topics. The first topic dealt with (the concept of demolition), while the second topic dealt with (contemporary French ceramics). Chapter Three contained the research procedures, including the research community, its sample, the research methodology, the research tool, and the analysis of the research sample, which numbered (5) ceramic models from the research community, which numbered (100) ceramic models. The researcher adopted the descriptive method as a method of analysis for its compatibility with the specificity of the current research, based on the indicators resulting from the theoretical framework, as criteria for analyzing the research sample. Chapter Four contained the research results, the most prominent of which are: -

1.      The demolition works in a single ceramic work achieved the innovation of new forms and elements used that were not previously circulated.

2.      The potter confirmed in the demolition works his objection to traditional forms, decorations, and drawings, through the use of an artistic style that tends toward openness and multiple readings.

Chapter Four also contained conclusions, the most prominent of which are:

1.    The potter expressed his objection to the stereotypical and traditional character of the decorations and ceramic works dating back to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

2.    The potter employed demolition through the multiplicity and diversity of his executed works, in the same ceramic form.

In conclusion, the researcher reached recommendations and suggestions with a summary in English.